Ideologi Sosial Dalam Kesenian Tradisional Angklung Sered: Dari Alat Perjuangan Hingga Sebagai Sarana Hiburan Masyarakat

Authors

  • Agus Ahmad Wakih Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Juju Masunah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Tati Narawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Cece Rakhmat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v33i2.2586

Abstract

ABSTRACT For 350 years, Indonesia was under the rule of foreign countries before gaining independence in 1945. This colonization had a significant impact on the social, cultural, economic, and political aspects of Indonesian society. The people expressed their resistance through traditional performing arts, such as angklung sered in Balandongan, Tasikmalaya, West Java. This art form served as a tool of struggle against the colonizers. The objective of this research is to discover the values of social ideology embedded in angklung sered within the community of Balandongan. The research methodology employed semiotic analysis, focusing on the text and context of the angklung sered performances. Text analysis emphasizes the musical instrument used in the performance, while contextual analysis examines the artistic function of angklung sered before and after independence. The research data was obtained through interviews and documentary studies. The findings reveal that angklung sered served as a symbol of resistance before independence, while after independence, the emphasis shifted towards the aesthetics of the performance. Angklung sered also became a social ideology for the community, reflected in its meanings and symbols, serving as the foundation of their beliefs in everyday life. Keywords: Social Ideology, Culture, Traditional Art, Angklung Sered, Traditional Performing Arts ABSTRAK Selama 350 tahun, Indonesia dikuasai oleh negara-negara asing sebelum merdeka pada tahun 1945. Penjajahan ini berdampak besar pada sosial, budaya, ekonomi, dan politik bangsa Indonesia. Masyarakat menunjukkan perlawanan melalui seni pertunjukan tradisional seperti angklung sered di Balandongan, Tasikmalaya, Jawa Barat. Seni ini dijadikan sebagai alat perjuangan melawan penjajah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menemukan nilai-nilai ideologi sosial masyarakat dalam angklung sered di Balandongan. Metode penelitian menggunakan analisis semiotika, fokus pada teks dan konteks pertunjukan angklung sered. Analisis teks berfokus pada alat musik angklung yang digunakan, sedangkan analisis konteks memeriksa fungsi kesenian ini sebelum dan setelah kemerdekaan. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui wawancara dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan angklung sered sebelum kemerdekaan menjadi simbol perjuangan, sementara setelahnya lebih menekankan estetika pertunjukan. Angklung sered juga menjadi ideologi sosial masyarakat, tercermin dalam makna dan simbolnya yang menjadi dasar keyakinan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Kata kunci: Ideologi Sosial, Budaya, Kesenian Tradisional, Angklung Sered, Seni Pertunjukan Tradisional

References

Adhi, M. K. (2016). The strategy of cultural poverty alleviation based on empowering local genius. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(11), 1569–1573. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20163124

Ani, M. (2016). WACANA BUDAYA SUNDA DAN IDEOLOGI DI DALAM TAYANGAN SINETRON (Analisis Semiotika Sinetron “Preman Pensiun 2”).

Ardini, N. W. (2015). Industrialisasi Musik Pop Bali: Ideologi, Kepentingan, dan Praktiknya. Segara Widya: Jurnal Penelitian Seni, 3.

Ardini, N. W. (2018). Reconstruction of social ideology through the power of music: Case study of Suntaraporn band, Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.05.003

Banton, M. (2014). Arts and Aesthetics in a Globalizing World.

Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2019). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. John Wiley & Sons.

Brandon, L. (2006). Art Or Memorial?: The Forgotten History of Canada’s War Art. University of Calgary Press Calgary.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Carey, M., & Foster, V. (2013). Social work, ideology, discourse and the limits of post-hegemony. Journal of Social Work, 13(3), 248–266.

Chambers, E. (2018). Soul of a Nation: Art in the Age of Black Power. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 17(2–3), 225–227.

De La Fuente, E. (2014). Why aesthetic patterns matter: Art and a “qualitative” social theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(2), 168–185.

Dissanayake, E. (2011). Doing without the ideology of art. New Literary History, 42(1), 71–79.

Frolova, E. L. (2008). Ethnic and Cultural Functions of Name in Traditional Japanese Society. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 35(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeae.2008.11.009

Gibbs, G. R. (2018). Analyzing qualitative data (Vol. 6). Sage.

Hauser, A. (1971). Propaganda, ideology and art. Aspects of History and Class Consciousness, 128–152.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Hillebrand, J. D., & Berg, B. L. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. In Teaching Sociology (Vol. 28, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1319429

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651.

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

Kotthoff, H. (1995). The social semiotics of Georgian toast performances: Oral genre as cultural activity. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00063-K

Lisa Jean Moore, M. J. C. (2015). The Body Social and Cultural Dissections. Routledge.

Lukmana, I. (2010). Analisis bahasa untuk kajian sosial: pemaknaan kritis terhadap praktek berwacana sebagai praktek sosial. Udayana University.

Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching. sage.

McLelland, D. (1995). Ideology. Buckingham. Open University Press.

Mills, C. W. (2005). “Ideal theory” as ideology. Hypatia, 20(3), 165–183.

Morrison, K. (2006). Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Formations of modern social thought. Sage.

Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2012a). From an individualized to a societal social psychology: Ideology and ideological changes as reflected in language usage. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 741–755.

Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2012b). Ideology and social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 282–294.

Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. Bmj, 320(7227), 114–116.

Purvis, T., & Hunt, A. (1993). Discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology, discourse, ideology... British Journal of Sociology, 473–499.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage.

Satori, A., & Andrias, M. A. (2012). Pergerakan Prilaku Politik Islam Tradisional Pasca Pemilu Legislatif tahun 2009 di Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 1(1), 53–70.

Sawitri, S., Sudardi, B., Abdullah, W., & Chaya, I. N. (2020). Ideology of Bedhayan Dance in Surakarta in Globalization Era.

SAWYER, K. (2019). Creativity as a Process. The Creativity Reader, 385.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage publications.

Thompson, J. B. (2013). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. John Wiley & Sons.

Varshney, L. R., Rajani, N. F., & Socher, R. (2020). Explaining Creative Artifacts. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2010.07126.

Webb, R., Schratz, M., & Walker, R. (1996). Research as Social Change, New Opportunities for Qualitative Research. In British Journal of Educational Studies (Vol. 44, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3122476

Becker, J. (2004). Deep Listeners: Music, Emotion, and Trancing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Published

2023-07-05

How to Cite

Wakih, A. A., Masunah, J., Narawati, T., & Rakhmat, C. (2023). Ideologi Sosial Dalam Kesenian Tradisional Angklung Sered: Dari Alat Perjuangan Hingga Sebagai Sarana Hiburan Masyarakat. Panggung, 33(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v33i2.2586

Citation Check