Modus Dominasi Pada Habitus Masyarakat Nadoman

Authors

  • Muhammad Zainal Arifin SMK Singaparna, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26742/pantun.v4i1.1110

Abstract

The forming of habitus is influenced by the dominance modus of an agent who is successful on applying his capital in a field. The capital meant by Bourdieu in a habitus theory are economic capital, cultural capital, social capital, and symbolic capital. The modus of dominance can be seen through the application of one’s symbolic capital. The higher one’s symbolic capital, the more powerful he is to control his surroundings. The capitals are from pride and prestige possessed. The habitus of Nadoman people on the Mosque Council of Tsamrotul Fuad Islamic Boarding School Cipasung is constructed based on the dominance modus conducted by the people with their symbolic power. The method of this research is qualitative by applying Pierre Bourdieu’s habitus theory. The result shows that Nadoman people behave based on the dominance of an agent’s symbolic power within their relation concept guiding individuals to adapt in their conflicting situation.

Keywords: habitus, dominance, Nadoman, behavior, Pesantren/Islamic boarding school

References

Berger Peter dan Luckman, Thomas. 1990. ”Tafsiran Sosial Atas Kenyataan Risalah Tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan”. Jakarta: LP3ES

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. London: Cambridge University Press

Creswell JW. 2010. Research Design. Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Edisi Ketiga (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: : Pustaka Pelajar

Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. 2011. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kyai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES

Gazalba, Sidi. 1998. Islam dan Kesenian: Relevansi Islam dan Seni Budaya. Jakarta: Pustaka Alhusna

Grenfell, Michel. 2008. Peirre Bourdieu Key Concept. Trowbridge: Acumen Cromwell Press

Hafid, Putra M. 2012. Seni Resitasi Sinrilik dalam Konteks Upacara Adat Perkawinan Suku Makassar di Kabupaten Kabupaten Gowa Sulawesi Selatan (Suatu Kajian Etnomusikologi). Yogyakarta: UGM

Haryatmoko. 2003. Etika Politik dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas

Heriyawati, Yanti. 2016. Seni Pertunjukan dan Ritual. Yogyakarta:Penerbit Ombak

Krisdinanto, Nanang. Pierre Bourdieu, Sang Juru Damai. “Jurnal Kanal Vol.2, No.2, Maret 2014. Hal 107-206.

Kusdiana, Ading. 2014. Sejarah Pesantren; Jejak, Penyebaran, dan Jaringannya di Wilayah Priangan. Bandung:: Humaniora

Lahpan, Neneng. 2009. Tembang Dari Pesantren: Membaca Relasi Islam dan Kebudayaan Sunda Melalui Seni Pupujian/Nadoman. Bandung: STSI Bandung

Lahpan, Neneng. 2015. Negotiating Islam and Ethnicity in Islamic Musical Performance in West Java Indonesia. Ph.D thesis. Monash University, Australia.

Ritzer, George. 2004. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada media Group

Ritzer, George. 2015. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta:: Prenadamedia Group

Rusdiarti, Suma Riella. 2003. Bahasa, Pertarungan Simbolik dan kekuasaan. Jurinal Basis Edisi 11-12 (NovemberDesember).

Syafei, Imam. Pondok Pesantren: Lembaga Pendidikan Pembentukan Karakter” dalam Jurnal Al-tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, volume 8, Mei 2017

Umar, Nasaruddin. 2014. Rethinking Pesantren. Jakarta:: PT Elex Media Komputindo

Yahya, Iip D. 2006. Ajengan Cipasung Biografi KH. Moh. Ilyas Ruhiat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pesantren (Kelompok Penerbit LKiS)

Downloads

Published

2019-06-01

Citation Check